Independent review
Five specialists review in parallel and produce structured findings with quotes.
AI pre-submission peer review
PeerPanel runs your manuscript through independent domain-style reviewers, then forces them to deliberate with page-level evidence. Catch desk-rejection risks before you submit.
PDF up to 50 MB. Results in about 8 minutes.
Built for researchers who need clear signal before submission
Workflow
PeerPanel follows a clear protocol story: independent review, adversarial deliberation, retractions when evidence does not hold, and editorial synthesis.
Five specialists review in parallel and produce structured findings with quotes.
Agents rebut, retract, or escalate each other's claims using manuscript evidence.
A final editor weighs consensus, contested findings, and unique risks into a score.
Technical checks
What makes it different
PeerPanel does not stitch together one model response. Each specialist has a mandate, sees competing claims, and must defend or retract with paper evidence.
Every shipped finding includes a location, a claim, and a reason it matters.
No names, affiliations, or prestige signals enter the review prompt.
Free scan + paid reviews
Upload a manuscript PDF for a free scan. See how many issues your paper has, how serious they are, and where they live. Need the full editorial board? A complete review with all five agents starts at $10 for students, $14 for everyone.